There is widespread criticism of shifting the capital region of Andhra Pradesh from Amaravati to 3 regions Amaravati, Vizag, and Kadapa.My views as a journalist.
Today on the ongoing protests on the capital region identifying the landmark precautions. This means what does the constitution of India says with respect to having a shift in the capital region.
This means the outcry for justification of three capitals must be included in the portfolio documents related to reorganizing act. This simply means the ordinance passed for 3 capitals in Andhra Pradesh is not fulfilling the concept of adhering to principles of unity and proclaimed justification. The nature of the constitution further says this. When the accumulated significant progress is going to detect the principle outwork of justice this leads to proclaimed offense. The nature of substantial propaganda regarding the inputs given by different Portugal consultancies is simply biased and read out the statements by judicial overview. This is not a state problem because offense conducted on the principles of justification with altered or manipulated instances leads to a pragmatic or often theoretical process of failure in State government. The principles of foundations layed in the constitution clearly mention these points to be adhered to by intellectual disagreement.
The vile of question pending before the constitutional values say that the maintenance of trust and maintenance of disagreement is one of the preambles under which the constitution is framed.
The constitution supplies that whether given under pretext is not to be overlooked by suggesting categories of mention. So let me say this principle on clearer terms and conditions.
Articles of constitutional validity say the incumbent government of ruling cannot degrade a particular class or more particular principles of unity to become offended or proclaimed duty. This clearly means the whereabout of significant progress is to be valid theoretically and proportionally. The case of bringing biased favors to a particular region of a state based on principles violating procedures that are carried is questionable. This simply means the office of the chief minister is governing principles of leading the state through enigmatic and precautionary duties based on circumstantial or mollified instances of corrupt practices favorite decisions based on approval of justice and casualties that refrain the valid trust and honesty of calendar items. I can further say the reputation of the state is based on principles of honesty and truthfulness in authoritative decisions. Biased or often retrogative to base arguments of false or pretension is to be defined as negative policies by government intending to favor particular region based on utmost calibrated principles of justice and also category of pre intended law forcing its behavior through planting hatred and righteousness of biased decisions to prevent or agree or favor particular region through differential or appropriate behavior is chosen from calibrated or findings of Boston group or any other committee to propaganda of intentional misleading. This clearly means the acceptance or failure is through carrying principles to outsmart constitutional validity based on circumstantial manipulation that is carried through formulaic or casualties related to agreement or disagreement of relational data.
This means the forgoing battle between acceptability or indulging in the varsity of the new capitals in Andhra Pradesh is questionable offense based on disagreements or through force full disturbance. Thanks for ascertaining the criteria incumbent rather dutiful progressive officers based on theoretical or often judgemental in the process of an ordinance passed. This clearly means the incumbent government of Andhra Pradesh is regarded as opulence and biased to favor certain regions for the thirst of culture based on categories or propaganda of false testimonials in favor opulence to be handled or regarded as favors in the background with intentions of problematic or overly ruled assets in possession. Hence as a Journalist, I can read the preamble of the Constitution based on categories of trust maintained between citizens and ruling. The reason for judging cannot be based on altered or manipulated evidence. It simply means you are forging the documents with the intention of biased and manipulative to categorically gain the pleasure of ruling through bias or supporting biased judgment. This simply means the case is now between forgeries document of evidence in case of death caused due to principles of judgment through categories.