Today I wish to log my thoughts on two essential aspects of human civilization. They are nurturing and able to nurture. Both nurturing and the ability to nurture are very commonly mistaken by human tendency. Life is certainly not carried by blossoming feathers or judgemental rose flowers. Do you see I used interchangeable words? There is a reason to use interchangeable words. Today I studied a magazine with prominent colors attributed to feminism. There is a degree of truth in accepting feminism. But isn’t it true to render the challenges of females? I do not know. I do not know about various constraints. But let us say feminism seeks objective reality while treating her with dignity. Yes, true, but in implementable steps is it can be forced. What happens in truth with forced legislations on treating feminism with objective reality is, in fact, the opposite of what has been a tendency of expectations. Do you see a law forcing beyond objective reality as a tendency to bring a significant disaster in implementation? A forced implementation leads to objective failure. Let me take an example if you say ocean without tides. Is it possible? If you say ocean without excluding violent tides, is that possible? So we need to draw a line on which is meant by the objective reality that can be controlled and which cannot. It is a true woman of the nation who needs security in the hands of officials. But drawing a personal line will disturb the natural eco-system. People may not like my anecdote, but drawing a personal line on the behavior of men towards women is becoming more relevant in today’s appeared dogma towards results. I may not be correct. I apologize if I have crossed my limits, but this is not a newspaper but a blog where I express my inner truth of resemblance between what direct procedures will affect possible complications in the future of my country or region.
Today I saw specific laws in my region where they wish to expedite judicial inquiry and punish female arrogance within 21 days to death sentence based on conditions. There was a law enforced by one of the governments in my region previously. Do they understand what is meant by enforcing and punishing a person within 21 days for a habit? Do you know in our culture, it takes 21 days to build a good habit? But the law proposes to punish an implemented error within 21 days. Do you think forensic reports can duly sign a person’s character in 21 days?
I will take a simple example I saw in nature. It is.
When a creation is letting it take place naturally, the heavenly subjectivity is to tighten the creation process into three days. Do you see a natural phenomenon to blossom takes 21 days to become habitual? But you wish to compress the birth of natural phenomena to take place within three days. Do you see where we are going in making legislation? Can we certainly compress the time of birth?
So do not argue with ascertained methods. The constitution is built according to my most poor understanding of fundamental thesis reports. But understating the thesis reports and formulating aggressive laws cannot compress the time of birth. Similarly, you cannot say on a person’s character with forensic investigations within 21 days as the law is made in one of our regions. It is a fundamental violation of aggressive compartmentalization. This may not be acceptable to every gender but the truth in the mind of an organized person is relatively prominent if not interested? As a blog writer, I wish to express where we need to draw the line on the objective characterization of instrumentation individuals.
To read further