Today I wish to discuss a rather ambiguous topic which is prominent in all literary overviews. It is having whether a dilemma or having a subsequent dilemma. The dilemma in question is about viewing and accepting rituals that are prominent for economic activity. Ha. Did you see something common? I am speaking about rituals that carry the economic activity. You might be surprised to note all rituals that are known in books of commerce. I am not speaking about rituals in religious or spiritual books. I am talking about rituals of economic activity that bring surplus from nature. So let me begin my journey deep dive into the topic. There are fundamentally three proceeding rituals in the economic activity of sounds. Then 5 rituals in economic disproportionate value of assets. So let me explain my point of view. Any honorable members of parliament can give a try at what I am discussing here. The primary rituals are
2. Scheduled time lag
3. Ascertaining python
So let me explain governance is not from improving social stigma associated with improving livelihood concerns. Governance needs to be through five parameters. The foundation for governance should resemble the sky from the equatorial region. Let me bring clarity to what I am trying to present. The equatorial region in a country starts with the average pinnacle of business entities. Each business entity that is based on hybrid quality is the one that differentiates governance. Hybrid is the variety of problems that they are solving. Suppose you see organic farming as a widely discussed topic. Organic farming sounds enumerative to solve the pain points of governance? Does it really solve? The problem statement is improving health through organic inhibitors cultivating enormous demand structure. But the truth is a lack of awareness. Now, do you create demand for organic consumables through wide advertisement? It does not work that way. Organic farming, though, has pros and cons; there is relatively less demand. The demand cannot be created through awareness programs. So what I mean is demand gets created through pain points of successive well-written publications. Now go back to science journals that write about verified results of organic farming. Are there enough pain point research papers that bring breakthroughs in organic farming? I can clearly say no. So when there is no substantial evidence either in peer groups or scientific journals of the reputation, we are trying to bring awareness for its use. I am bringing this dilemma and discussion to understand the depth of subject expertise that needs to be inculcated within our society fragment. The proof of organic farming improving livelihood concerns through an earthly basis is a wrong statement to be well recorded in reputed journals. So any Indian or foreign cultures have this known and discussed time period forever. But see, we are trying to bring a wide awareness with a lack of foundational bias. Might be I did not read all the journals related to organic farming. But why I brought this topic for discussion because whenever we as individuals make claims of achievements, we need to go a step further to publish our results in peer groups or take societal acceptance tests. This way, when we roll out policies for our country, we recollect that this is a valid strategy or valid portion that brings results. We need to inculcate this type of innovation in our inquiry from childhood. Then the innovative ideas become disruptive because there is well-recorded evidence for the demand and results. This is well known in all educational institutions. Still, awareness has to happen at individuals, so they know there is a limitation for our understanding. Deep inside, the clutters of unclarity becomes an educational value to innovate systematically. Did you see my point when we start inculcating the knowledge from childhood to learn the evidence and material proofs or peer group reviews are important to get recognized as authentic then the child learns the importance of going that extra step to innovate their insecurities or there high-income solutions that carry precautionary or exemplary rewards? These are the rituals of learning foundations that build economic strength through valuable advice rather than enormity conditions in discussed charges.
Now coming to burning disadvantages are we see there are limited resources to foundational theories. This helps functionaries at the diplomatic level improve the quality of testing procedures for scientific knowledge that is research enabled. This improves a knowledge-based society whose foundations are thoroughly marked as excellence in our country’s future enablers of youthful precautionary procedures. More, I shall opinionate later.